CLICK HERE TO RETURN TO GENII'S MAIN PAGE

Subscribe to Genii Buy Back Issues Kaufman and Company Advertise in Genii The Dealer Room Genii Books Genii Archive The Genii Forum Links Contact
RSS FEED


 
View Today's Active Topics
Page 1 of 2 12>
Topic Options
#201962 - 08/29/09 02:18 AM The Magic Menu
Seuss Online   content



Registered: 07/15/09
Posts: 118
Loc: Philadelphia, PA
Is back!

http://www.themagicmenu.com/subscribe.htm

Top
#207260 - 11/07/09 08:20 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Seuss]
Silly Walter Offline



Registered: 03/16/08
Posts: 90
I just noticed the line up of contributors. Christopher Lyle? Scott Guinn? Paul Gordon?

ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha !!!!!!!

They should see if they can get James Munton on staff too.

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha !!!!

Christopher Lyle as a contributor. That's rich, I'll say !!!
_________________________
Silly Walter The Polar Bear

Top
#207280 - 11/07/09 12:44 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Silly Walter]
Paul Gordon Online   content



Registered: 05/01/08
Posts: 162
Loc: UK
Dear Silly Walter,

May I ask why the rudeness? Have you read the 1st issue, or are you prejudiced? If you have read it, what don't you like?

Yours, Paul Gordon
_________________________
Secure Online Magic Shop: http://www.paulgordon.net/shop.html

Top
#207281 - 11/07/09 12:57 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Silly Walter]
Christopher Lyle Online   content



Registered: 11/07/09
Posts: 26
Loc: Texas
Silly Walter...

Have you and I ever met before? I must say that I have no clue who you are. Why do you find it "comical" that I'm a contributor?

Are you a subscriber? Have you given ANY of us a real chance?

Looking forward to hearing your thoughts...

Christopher Lyle
_________________________
In Mystery,

Christopher Lyle
http://www.lylemagic.com
Columnist - The Magic Menu

Top
#207283 - 11/07/09 01:09 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Christopher Lyle]
Richard Kaufman Administrator Online   content
The Chief Genii



Registered: 07/18/01
Posts: 12207
Loc: Washington DC
Silly Walter likes to poke people and see if they flinch.
Top
#207288 - 11/07/09 03:50 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Richard Kaufman]
Nathan Muir Offline



Registered: 06/07/09
Posts: 82
It was always a bit of an "amateur hour" effort, The Magic Menu. Like reading your great aunt's seasonal bulk letter. It's where guys from the little leagues get to pretend their A-Grade writers and authorities.
Top
#207292 - 11/07/09 05:21 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Nathan Muir]
Kent Gunn Online   sad



Registered: 05/15/08
Posts: 208
Loc: Bay Area, California
Nathan,

That's usually expressed Grade-A. The word you're trying to use is they're not their.

So, what makes you an expert on writing? Is it your extraordinary command of the English language or that fantastic magic career, with which, we're all so familiar? Sorry about that, I just thought the combination of a typo or two, combined with your chosen subject deserved a poke. Carry on.

Walter, you silly polar bear, whazzup?

I have no opinion on the Magic Menu, Jim Sisti or the others writing with him. I have a couple of Paul Gordon's books. He apparently knows the English language better than the small sampling I have for Mr. Muir.

Who's to say which restaurant worker's opinion is better than any other's? I don't know, I haven't worked a restaurant for over fifteen years.

Sisti's publication has always been geared to restaurant workers. If you don't think Sisti should draw writers in who actually work in restaurants, who should he have write for him? Oh that's right, it's none of your business. Simply don't buy the magazine if that's not your cup of ass-juice.

Walter, you know I still am on your side reflexively, neh? If you have dirt or nasty opinions, share them. Don't bash and run.

Top
#207295 - 11/07/09 05:35 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Kent Gunn]
Jon Allen Offline



Registered: 02/02/08
Posts: 49
Loc: UK
Here's some people who have contributed to The Maguc Menu:

Eugene Burger, Michael Ammar, Michael Close, Doc Eason, Bill Malone, Jamy Ian Swiss, Harry Lorayne, Kirk Charles, Jay Sankey, Simon Lovell, David Acer, Gregory Wilson, David Harkey

Who'd want to read anything by these "guys from the little leagues"?

Top
#207298 - 11/07/09 06:58 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Richard Kaufman]
mai-ling Online   crying



Registered: 05/10/08
Posts: 326
Loc: 60081
 Originally Posted By: Richard Kaufman
Silly Walter likes to poke people and see if they flinch.



Silly Walter took my place in poking at people.
_________________________
you will remember my name
www.mai-ling.net
world's youngest illusionista


Top
#207300 - 11/07/09 07:17 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Nathan Muir]
Paul Green Offline



Registered: 03/15/08
Posts: 197
Loc: California
 Originally Posted By: Nathan Muir
It was always a bit of an "amateur hour" effort, The Magic Menu. It's where guys from the little leagues get to pretend their A-Grade writers and authorities.


Nathan Muir (and everyone else),

Everyone is certainly entitled to their own opinions. But, as someone that has been with the Magic Menu for a number of years (!), I don't consider Jim Sisti, Al Ulman, Mark Bryne, or myself as "little leaguers". Scott Guinn and Paul Gordon are both recognized authors. Tom Frank and Mark Zacharia have been around for more than a moment. Chris Lyle is a new name, but he does have substantial credentials.

Kent Gunn and Jon Allen have stated their cases well. TMM has been considered a great source for restaurant and bar performers. I have lost count of the people that have approached me at conventions and told me how much they have learned and benefitted from the Menu's pages and writers.

Nathan Muir, if you haven't received value for your money and time, you are in the minority. Spend your time elsewhere.

To everyone else, I hope you continue to enjoy and learn from those that share their opinions, routines, and dreams with our readers. It has always been my honor to be included with some great people.

Enjoy the search.

Respectfully,

Paul Green

PS Send me a story or two. That way you can be a "little leaguer" along with the rest of us.

Top
#207301 - 11/07/09 07:40 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Kent Gunn]
Nathan Muir Offline



Registered: 06/07/09
Posts: 82
 Originally Posted By: Kent Gunn
Nathan,

That's usually expressed Grade-A. The word you're trying to use is they're not their.



You got me on "their". However, since I was using a sporting analogy, A-grades vs Little League is appropriate.

Regardless of one typo, and an analogy you didn't pick up on, Kent, I am entitled to my opinion. This is a discussion forum, after all. However, if you choosee, feel free to focsu on myy splinge. Happy to provde as menny typos as will satisfie you're cravnge.

As to Jon Allen's contribution to the thread, most of the names he mentions (the ones I am interested in reading, such as Swiss) were interviews or feature pieces, not regular contributors.

Ironically, Paul Green is the only regular contributor I'd bother reading. And I'm not just saying that because he weighed in to the thread.

As for Jim Sisti, his columns remind me of Mark Twain's observation on Christian Science writing: "chloroform in print."

Top
#207305 - 11/07/09 09:22 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Nathan Muir]
Kent Gunn Online   sad



Registered: 05/15/08
Posts: 208
Loc: Bay Area, California
Nathan,

When I read your first post I thought, for a moment you were being self-mocking. You wrote,

"It's where guys from the little leagues get to pretend their A-Grade writers and authorities."

I apologize for missing the baseball analogy. It certainly flows. Had you merely capitalized Little League as a true sports aficonado would have, it all would've been clear.

That's a joke.

I simply thought your harangue against their writing abilities that had a writing error in it was funny, it struck me as unintentional whimsy. Apparently you don't see the humor. When I run into a jerk, like myself online, I can't see the humor either.

Correcting other people's grammar or spelling is puerile and beneath even a cheap-shot artist like me. I'll refrain in the future. It adds nothing to the discussion.

You are certainly entitled to your opinion of the writers and the content in the Magic Menu. I have not made a careful enough review of the material to weigh in with my meaningless opinion. Your carping about the previous incarnation's content while the lads are trying to resurrect a magazine seems, to me, petty. Since they've got new writers why not read the first issue. If it's as bad as you think it is going to be, then post a scathing review.

Again, the spelling crack was out of line. I'm a mean-spirited old man, stuck in Albuquerque for the weekend.

I'm going to buy at least the first issue of The Magic Menu. I subscribe to only one magic magazine these days. Hmmmm . . . which one. Genii, of course. I can affort a copy of the new Sisti rag. If it's any good, to my tinted mind, I'll weigh in again with my meaningless opinion.

KG

PS. If you're going to quote Twain, get the right book. He used the line about chloroform when he was writing about the Book of Mormon in Roughing It. Are you putting this stuff in your posts as a trap for me? WTF. I know this is like their and they're. But you are not the intellectual you would like people to think you are. I'm not either.


Edited by Kent Gunn (11/07/09 09:24 PM)
Edit Reason: Roughing it was getting roughed up

Top
#207310 - 11/07/09 11:03 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Kent Gunn]
Mark.Lewis Online   content



Registered: 09/12/09
Posts: 439
I must say that I am quite amused at Nathan's description of the Sisti personage's writing. "Chloroform in Print" indeed. I must confess reluctantly that my opinion of young Nathan has gone up a notch.

I haven't read Sisti's chloroformic articles but I have no doubt that they are just as described. I will confess that I own a Sisti booklet and it is reasonably readable. I expect that was before he became chloroformic.

I have read issues of the old Magic Menu and it seemed quite good. I am not so sure of this new version. I am afraid that some of the contributors make me shudder when I read their names.

As for the silly suggestion above that James Munton be invited to write for the magazine I reel in horror because if that were to happen it would be the death knell of the magazine. On second thoughts that might not be a bad idea.


Top
#207317 - 11/07/09 11:26 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Kent Gunn]
Christopher Lyle Online   content



Registered: 11/07/09
Posts: 26
Loc: Texas
I find this conversation to be quite humerous...

Let me see if I'm understand this correctly. Since I'm not a BIG NAME in the world of magic, that means that I have no talent and nothing to contriubte? That's about what it all boils down to it seems. Am I correct?

Does anyone else think that's a complete load of BS or is it just me?

I can tell you from experience that they're people out there in the world of magic today that are more talented and more experienced than ANY big name Magician out there. Just becuase you've never heard of them doesn't make them a hack. It just means that you've never heard of them.

I have no claim to fame. I have nothing to sell you. I've never been on any magazine covers, never played The Castle, etc. But I do have real world experience "in the trenches" that gives me quite an insight into this little area of our craft.

Don't judge a book by it's cover. Just because you've never heard of someone, doesn't mean they don't have something to offer.

Paul Green said that I'm a "new name", but don't confuse that with being "new" to magic...as I am not.

Truth be told...I could really care less what a bunch of magicians think of me, the majority of whom hide behind fake names and avatars who have nothing better to do with their time then to make uneducated judgements on a magazine that they have never read.

However...I will continue...

I have no ambition to be FAMOUS! I have no ambition to be a NAME in magic. My only goal in life is to do what I love to do and that is to do magic and support my family doing it. It's bought me a beautiful home, new cars, puts food on my kitchen table and clothes on my daughters back. Could I ever ask for anything more? I'm living the dream...

All I know how to be the best Magician that I can be. Unlike many of you, I have never held a 9 to 5, 40 hour a week grind.

Over the last 25 years, I have made my career as a Restaurant Magician working anywhere from four to seven nights a week between two and six restaurants at a time...CONSISTANTLY w/o a break or any down time on top of performing for private parties and my Corporate Show. So when I speak, you can BANK on pretty much anything that I say.

Here's the best part. I have been able to do all of the above all without being a NAME or a FAMOUS PERSON inside of a very small community of people.

Do you think that outside of the Magic World, that Jeff McBride is anyone? (Love ya Jeff!) To us...he's a God that many bow down to. Outside of the Magic world, he's a nerd who wears pajamas everywhere he goes.

My point here is being a BIG NAME outside of our own little click of people means absolutly nothing. So who cares?

Those of you who have no interest in learning anything about the world of restaurant, strolling, and bar magic should spend your money elsewhere. This won't interest you...

However, if you want to learn some great stuff, you should give us a chance and subscribe and see what all the buzz is about. Paul Gordon and Scott Guinn are two other people whom you will want to keep your eyes on. GREAT STUFF from both (Scott especially!).

This whole thing began from some silly little rant from some silly little bear that I've never met and to my account have never had any dealings with prior. He has never responded to my inquiry so I dismiss him as some random guy that I must have pissed off in the past.

Can't please everyone!



Edited by Christopher Lyle (11/07/09 11:37 PM)
_________________________
In Mystery,

Christopher Lyle
http://www.lylemagic.com
Columnist - The Magic Menu

Top
#207320 - 11/07/09 11:30 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Christopher Lyle]
Mark.Lewis Online   content



Registered: 09/12/09
Posts: 439
Do stop bragging Christopher my boy. It is most unbecoming for a professional. Bragging about one's ability is certainly something you will never seem me do as it most unbecoming.

You are supposed to be a professional after all not a "perfeshanal" as described in Our Magic.

Top
#207322 - 11/07/09 11:37 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Mark.Lewis]
Christopher Lyle Online   content



Registered: 11/07/09
Posts: 26
Loc: Texas
Mark...

Must we continue to walk down this same path over and over and over again?
_________________________
In Mystery,

Christopher Lyle
http://www.lylemagic.com
Columnist - The Magic Menu

Top
#207326 - 11/07/09 11:55 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Christopher Lyle]
Mark.Lewis Online   content



Registered: 09/12/09
Posts: 439
Indeed we must. It is a hobby of mine. However I am now irritated to find that other people are copying my hobby and have started to snipe at you without my formal permission to do so.

I don't like to see people ganged up on so I will withdraw from the sniping if I see it getting out of hand. I might even change sides and defend you. Mind you it might be a bit like defending the Alamo.

Top
#207327 - 11/07/09 11:58 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Kent Gunn]
Nathan Muir Offline



Registered: 06/07/09
Posts: 82
 Originally Posted By: Kent Gunn
I simply thought your harangue against their writing abilities that had a writing error in it was funny, it struck me as unintentional whimsy.


Oh, well. Ha. Ha. I was discussing a publication. If you want to discuss me, perhaps you should start another thread?

 Originally Posted By: Kent Gunn
Apparently you don't see the humor. When I run into a jerk, like myself online, I can't see the humor either.


Too much information. I'm not interested in you. No offense, etc.

 Quote:
Correcting other people's grammar or spelling is puerile and beneath even a cheap-shot artist like me. I'll refrain in the future. It adds nothing to the discussion.


Get on with it. Spit it out. These circular self-analytical digressions are painful.

 Quote:
You are certainly entitled to your opinion of the writers and the content in the Magic Menu.


Exactly. No more needs to be said. If you're intending to go on with more self-analysis or analysis of who or what you think I am and whether I am entitled to post a comment, stow it. You must have me confused with someone who could give a shit.

 Quote:
I have not made a careful enough review of the material to weigh in with my meaningless opinion. Your carping about the previous incarnation's content while the lads are trying to resurrect a magazine seems, to me, petty. Since they've got new writers why not read the first issue. If it's as bad as you think it is going to be, then post a scathing review.

Again, the spelling crack was out of line. I'm a mean-spirited old man, stuck in Albuquerque for the weekend.

I'm going to buy at least the first issue of The Magic Menu. I subscribe to only one magic magazine these days. Hmmmm . . . which one. Genii, of course. I can affort a copy of the new Sisti rag. If it's any good, to my tinted mind, I'll weigh in again with my meaningless opinion.


Finished giving yourself an intervention? Like I said, you should have stopped at an acknowledgment that I'm entitled to my opinion. This thread isn't about you or me in a personal sense.

 Quote:
PS. If you're going to quote Twain, get the right book. He used the line about chloroform when he was writing about the Book of Mormon in Roughing It. Are you putting this stuff in your posts as a trap for me? WTF.


The quote was on my mind because I heard Christopher Hitchens specifically attribute it as being in reference to Eddy at a recent lecture.

http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/10/christopher_hitchens_seems_to.php

I've just done a Google search and found people online correcting Hitchen's misattribution. Bully for you. I'm certainly no expert on Mormonism or Christian Science, so I'll defer to your scholarship. It appears that I took Hitchens' word on blind faith. Now there's an irony for you.

 Quote:
I know this is like their and they're. But you are not the intellectual you would like people to think you are. I'm not either.


Because I have a low but honestly held opinion of third rate magic magazine, you have the balls to make judgments on my intellect? While you waste your time defending magazines you haven't read, I'll continue to listen to lectures by the Hitch. Intellectual enough for you? Meanwhile, you can shove your ad hominem attempts to shut down free opinion up your ass.

But don't let this tough love get you down, Sparky. I like you the cut of your jib.





Top
#207328 - 11/08/09 12:03 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Nathan Muir]
Mark.Lewis Online   content



Registered: 09/12/09
Posts: 439
Dearie me. I think calling the Magic Menu a "third rate magazine" is a trifle libellous. Even I said it was only a "second rate magazine" You really owe Sisti an apology.
Top
#207331 - 11/08/09 01:57 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Mark.Lewis]
Nathan Muir Offline



Registered: 06/07/09
Posts: 82
I doubt it. The Magic Menu never was in the same league as Genii, as just one example. Only in magic would it stir up such passion to point out the obvious.
Top
#207332 - 11/08/09 02:19 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Nathan Muir]
Paul Gordon Online   content



Registered: 05/01/08
Posts: 162
Loc: UK
The Magic Menu was/is geared towards professional magicians and entertainers; whereas most magic magazines tend to be geared toward the amateur. Sadly, some hobbiest/amateur magicians just don't seem to realise the very big difference. So, The Magic Menu is not in the same league as Genii, and Genii is not in the same league as The Magic Menu. It's like comparing ice-cream and steak...you can't!

Btw; that's not a knock about hobbiest magicians or those kind of magazines.

Paul Gordon
_________________________
Secure Online Magic Shop: http://www.paulgordon.net/shop.html

Top
#207335 - 11/08/09 03:31 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Paul Gordon]
Richard Kaufman Administrator Online   content
The Chief Genii



Registered: 07/18/01
Posts: 12207
Loc: Washington DC
I think many people will be happy to see The Magic Menu back in publication on a regular basis.

Sales will determine whether the line-up of contributors is up to snuff.

I saw the first of the new issues today in the dealer room here in LA and it looked first-rate to me.

Top
#207348 - 11/08/09 09:55 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Richard Kaufman]
John LeBlanc Offline



Registered: 01/17/08
Posts: 98
Loc: Houston, TX
 Originally Posted By: Richard Kaufman
I saw the first of the new issues today in the dealer room here in LA and it looked first-rate to me.


I thought it looked first rate, too. I'm nearly done reading it and I think it holds up well to the expectations I had, considering the impressive history of the previous incarnation. Jim should be very proud.

John

Top
#207354 - 11/08/09 11:56 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: John LeBlanc]
Paul Gordon Online   content



Registered: 05/01/08
Posts: 162
Loc: UK
Dear Christopher: I agree 100%

Dear Jon: I agree 100%

Dear John: I agree 100%

PG
_________________________
Secure Online Magic Shop: http://www.paulgordon.net/shop.html

Top
#207385 - 11/08/09 10:08 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Lee Almond]
Mark.Lewis Online   content



Registered: 09/12/09
Posts: 439
My mother is somewhat deceased at the moment so I am not able to stay in her basement.
I must say that Mr Almond is disgracefully profane. I am afraid I am not inclined to hang around here to converse with the lower classes. I shall let the "perfeshanals" chatter among themselves while I go elsewhere to educate those who wish to be educated.
Cheerio.

Top
#207387 - 11/08/09 10:11 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Mark.Lewis]
Richard Kaufman Administrator Online   content
The Chief Genii



Registered: 07/18/01
Posts: 12207
Loc: Washington DC
I've tried to clean up this thread, but you guys should be ashamed of yourselves that you can't have a decent discussion about this without being jerks.
Top
#207393 - 11/08/09 10:51 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Richard Kaufman]
Ray Banks Offline



Registered: 01/17/08
Posts: 83
Loc: Houston, TX
I guess my two cents is that if Nathan or anyone else doesn't think that the Magic Menu is a worthwhile journal---then don't subscribe and/or don't read it but that will be your decision so please spare us the discussion.

I happen to be a subscriber and I do read it. I still reference the old Magic Menus from time to time.

The current issue is a restart so there are some columns in it that are introductory. I know it will get more into the working of restaurant and close up magic by the next issue.

Like I said---my two cents.





Edited by Ray Banks (11/08/09 10:52 PM)
_________________________
Pick a card....Any card....NO not THAT card..THIS one!

Ray Banks

Top
#207406 - 11/09/09 02:07 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Ray Banks]
Nathan Muir Offline



Registered: 06/07/09
Posts: 82
 Originally Posted By: Ray Banks
I guess my two cents is that if Nathan or anyone else doesn't think that the Magic Menu is a worthwhile journal---then don't subscribe and/or don't read it but that will be your decision so please spare us the discussion.


Ray.

This is a discussion forum.

The area of interest for this forum is magic.

I have read the Magic Menu and am a member of this forum. Therefore if I choose to discuss it why would there be any problem? Agree or disagree - state your case and be done with it as you choose. But don't tell people that they cannot comment if they have an opinion that differs from yours.

Every day in newspapers and magazines around the world people publish critiques and dissenting opinions on politics, art, literature and so on. It's a healthy intellectual exercise that informs and entertains, especially when it gets a little heated. Join in or don't.

Nathan

Top
#207408 - 11/09/09 02:35 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Nathan Muir]
Christopher Lyle Online   content



Registered: 11/07/09
Posts: 26
Loc: Texas
 Originally Posted By: Nathan Muir

I have read the Magic Menu and am a member of this forum.


Nathan,

Have you read the NEW Magic Menu? Have you truely given us a chance? Why do you feel that we have nothing to offer to the community and that we're all just a bunch of 2nd rate hacks?
_________________________
In Mystery,

Christopher Lyle
http://www.lylemagic.com
Columnist - The Magic Menu

Top
#207409 - 11/09/09 02:59 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Christopher Lyle]
Nathan Muir Offline



Registered: 06/07/09
Posts: 82
Christopher,

I think Magic Menu has something to offer. Charming little amateur publications are fun to read at times, too. I just don't think the magazine and many of its commentators are in the league of a product like Genii. I have both of the L&L compilations and they are like the Curate's egg: good in parts. I very much enjoyed the Swiss interview, for example. But many of the advice columns are somewhat sophomoric at times, or simply obvious in their wisdoms and insights.

I am sure the magazine is very useful to a complete beginner who wants to do some bar or restaurant magic. Some of the tricks were excellent in that regard.

It is perfectly valid for me to make these observations and valid for someone to attempt to refute them.

If I see it at a friend's house and flick through it and discover it has been elevated to a standard of design and content quality on par with Genii, I will be the first to express that I am impressed.

Nathan

Top
#207410 - 11/09/09 03:21 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Nathan Muir]
Christopher Lyle Online   content



Registered: 11/07/09
Posts: 26
Loc: Texas
 Originally Posted By: Nathan Muir

I think Magic Menu has something to offer.


I'm glad you feel that way.

 Originally Posted By: Nathan Muir

Charming little amateur publications are fun to read at times, too.


Why do you consider The Magic Menu an "amateur" publication? Every single one the columnists is a Full Time Professional. How can a magazine made up of Full Time Pro's be considered amateur? Please explain...?

 Originally Posted By: Nathan Muir

I just don't think the magazine and many of its commentators are in the league of a product like Genii.


Hmmmm...last time I checked, I never knew we were supposed to be in direct competetion with Genii OR Magic or any other publication. Why can't we all just co-exist?

 Originally Posted By: Nathan Muir

I have both of the L&L compilations and they are like the Curate's egg: good in parts.


I could say the same of Genii or Magic or any other mag. Some parts I enjoy while others I think are just fluff to fill the pages. I think that's going to be true of any publication that you pick up...

I'm not saying the MM is full of fluff...but my point is that no matter what we do, we cannot please everyone 100% of the time. You are condemning us and haven't even read what we're about.

 Originally Posted By: Nathan Muir

But many of the advice columns are somewhat sophomoric at times, or simply obvious in their wisdoms and insights.


Such as...?

 Originally Posted By: Nathan Muir

I am sure the magazine is very useful to a complete beginner who wants to do some bar or restaurant magic. Some of the tricks were excellent in that regard.


So you think that we cater only to the beginner? Why is that? Why don't you feel a seasoned professional (as all of the people involved in this project are) has anything to learn from people who have over 200+ years of collective experience.

 Originally Posted By: Nathan Muir

If I see it at a friend's house and flick through it and discover it has been elevated to a standard of design and content quality on par with Genii, I will be the first to express that I am impressed.


You are free to do whatever you wish, but I think it's awefully rude of you or anyone to make these judgements based on not being properly educated with what we're trying to accomplish here. You've pretty much stated that you think we're all a bunch of hacks (for reasons I have yet to understand) yet you haven't even given us a read.

I could understand if you had read us already and didn't like what we said or disagreed with us and then offered your commentary, but it sounds like to me you're saying you don't like to eat steak when you haven't even tried it.

Like the old sayin' goes...Ain't Tried It? Don't Knock It!


Edited by Christopher Lyle (11/09/09 03:25 AM)
_________________________
In Mystery,

Christopher Lyle
http://www.lylemagic.com
Columnist - The Magic Menu

Top
#207411 - 11/09/09 03:59 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Christopher Lyle]
Paul Gordon Online   content



Registered: 05/01/08
Posts: 162
Loc: UK
Dear Nathan,

You are, of course, allowed to express your opinion, but it's the way that you express it that is hard to bear. Your tone is haughty and patronising. If you've not fully read the new MM, then you are being prejudiced; but either way, you make "statements" as if your words are sacrosanct. Not very nice!

Paul Gordon

P.S - Why use Genii as a yardstick? As I said before, you can't compare Genii to MM and you can't compare MM to Genii. They are two different beasts.
_________________________
Secure Online Magic Shop: http://www.paulgordon.net/shop.html

Top
#207412 - 11/09/09 04:32 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Paul Gordon]
Nathan Muir Offline



Registered: 06/07/09
Posts: 82
Enough whining, gentlemen. You are the merchandise and I am the consumer. I'll decide whether you meet my standards.
Top
#207413 - 11/09/09 04:55 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Nathan Muir]
Paul Gordon Online   content



Registered: 05/01/08
Posts: 162
Loc: UK
A) I'm not whining at all!
B) I'm not the merchandise; I'm an unpaid contributor!
C) You are not the consumer if you don't subscribe or read it!
D) And, as for "meeting your standards"...don't even go there!

Paul Gordon
_________________________
Secure Online Magic Shop: http://www.paulgordon.net/shop.html

Top
#207421 - 11/09/09 08:07 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Paul Gordon]
Mark.Lewis Online   content



Registered: 09/12/09
Posts: 439
I badly want to say that the new Magic Menu is awful but I can't because I haven't seen it. All I have to go on at the moment is one negative report from a young restaurant magician who subscribed.

I can only reluctantly say that previous issues do seem to be pretty good. And I agree that comparing it to Genii is like comparing apples to oranges. They are two different fruits. For the moment until I actually see the present issue all I can complain about is that the new bunch of contributors don't seem to be in the same class as the old bunch.

Still I can only speculate until I actually see a copy. I think I know where I can find one. Once I see it I shall comment on the matter in an objective way and of course my final word on this will be gospel on the matter.

Top
#207427 - 11/09/09 10:03 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Nathan Muir]
Christopher Lyle Online   content



Registered: 11/07/09
Posts: 26
Loc: Texas
 Originally Posted By: Nathan Muir
Enough whining, gentlemen. You are the merchandise and I am the consumer. I'll decide whether you meet my standards.


Nathan,

In your previous posts, you have made some very BOLD statements that are not only predjuice, but downright insulting to not only everyone who writes for the publication, but also those who have subscribed.

I think I have been biting my tongue "pretty well" up to this point but I have about lost my patience with you.

I have posed SEVERAL questions that you STILL have not answered...so I shall ask them once more in hopes that you will be human and fill in the blanks for many of us:

1. Why do you consider The Magic Menu an "amateur" publication? Every single one the columnists is a Full Time Professional. How can a magazine made up of Full Time Pro's be considered amateur? Please explain...?

2. I never knew we were supposed to be in direct competetion with Genii OR Magic or any other publication. Why can't we all just co-exist?

3. Why do you feel that many of the advice columns are somewhat sophomoric at times, or simply obvious in their wisdoms and insights? Please explain...

4. So you think that we cater only to the beginner? Why is that? Why don't you feel a seasoned professional (as all of the people involved in this project are) has anything to learn from people who have over 200+ years of collective experience.


That final question is one that I really hope you will take time to answer as in my opinion you have just insulted all 100+ subscribers that we have. Many of those folks are also full time professional workers who have provided us with their hard earned money to read how we feel they can be better and doing their job.

You say that we're whining? We're not! You have put us on the defensive and we're trying trying to figure out WHY?

Again...if you had read the NEW installment of The Magic Menu and were dissatisified with it, then that would be one thing. But you're not and for whatever reason are extremely prejudice against a publication and columnists that you obviously know NOTHING about.

You owe me absolutly nothing...but I think the DECENT thing to do since you have bashed up oneside and down the other to is please repond to those questions that I have posted...
_________________________
In Mystery,

Christopher Lyle
http://www.lylemagic.com
Columnist - The Magic Menu

Top
#207441 - 11/09/09 11:47 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Christopher Lyle]
mormonyoyoman Offline



Registered: 04/04/08
Posts: 30
It is amusing that Nathan, with such low standards as to use obscenities in his posts, whines that a magazine he hasn't read doesn't meet his standards. And he whines that everyone is picking on him, trying to "shut down" his "free opinion."

Mind you, being an American, I'm of the opinion everyone is entitled to their informed opinion. I'm also of the opinion that a "free" opinion is worth what one has paid for it. Evidently, Nate-boy feels that a "free opinion" means having no information whatsoever about the magazine other than the names of columnists. And, of course, the fact that it's not titled "Genii."

A magazine which is aimed at the hobbyist in each of us, compared to a magazine with a tight focus towards the close-up magician - with strong nods to the restaurant magician - such a comparison is, at best, ludicrous.

The quality of the Magic Menu speaks for itself. Did the first issue have problems? What first issue didn't? Will it improve? Undoubtedly. Does Nate have the slightest idea what the strengths, qualities, and problems might have been? Doubtful.

What we are seeing is a troll with a desperate need for attention. He's not even amusing. Mark Lewis serves a purpose and keeps us not only amused, but downright jolly. Nate is a pale imitation, who wants to grow up to be someone whose opinion counts.

*jeep!
--your obedient Grandpa

Top
#207445 - 11/09/09 12:01 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: mormonyoyoman]
Richard Kaufman Administrator Online   content
The Chief Genii



Registered: 07/18/01
Posts: 12207
Loc: Washington DC
Do I need to lock this thread?
Top
#207447 - 11/09/09 12:15 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Richard Kaufman]
mormonyoyoman Offline



Registered: 04/04/08
Posts: 30
Please.
Top
#207448 - 11/09/09 12:39 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: mormonyoyoman]
Richard Kaufman Administrator Online   content
The Chief Genii



Registered: 07/18/01
Posts: 12207
Loc: Washington DC
I mean ... really. How hard is it to have a decent discussion about this magazine without allowing it to get derailed by some twits.
Top
#207450 - 11/09/09 12:56 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Richard Kaufman]
Pete McCabe Online   content



Registered: 01/18/08
Posts: 1368
Loc: Woodland Hills
Feel free to lock this thread and the other half-dozen or so that are all exactly like this one: all noise, no signal.

In another month you won't be able to tell the Genii Forum from the Magic Cafe.

Top
#207451 - 11/09/09 12:59 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Richard Kaufman]
Paul Gordon Online   content



Registered: 05/01/08
Posts: 162
Loc: UK
 Originally Posted By: Richard Kaufman
I mean ... really. How hard is it to have a decent discussion about this magazine without allowing it to get derailed by some twits.


I hope I don't fall into the "twits" dept. I think my replies are very courteous...

Best, Paul Gordon
_________________________
Secure Online Magic Shop: http://www.paulgordon.net/shop.html

Top
#207452 - 11/09/09 01:03 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Paul Gordon]
John LeBlanc Offline



Registered: 01/17/08
Posts: 98
Loc: Houston, TX
Tom Frank the prophet. Who knew.

(Frankly, the back page of the new Magic Menu magazine is my new Parallax.)


Edited by John LeBlanc (11/09/09 01:08 PM)
Edit Reason: clarification.

Top
#207454 - 11/09/09 01:20 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: John LeBlanc]
Jonathan Townsend Online   content



Registered: 01/17/08
Posts: 3291
Loc: Westchester, NY
Glad to read that Jim's got his Magic Menu started up again. Best wishes on this run Mr. Sisti.
Top
#207483 - 11/09/09 03:51 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: mormonyoyoman]
Nathan Muir Offline



Registered: 06/07/09
Posts: 82
 Originally Posted By: mormonyoyoman
It is amusing that Nathan, with such low standards as to use obscenities in his posts, whines that a magazine he hasn't read doesn't meet his standards. And he whines that everyone is picking on him, trying to "shut down" his "free opinion."

Mind you, being an American, I'm of the opinion everyone is entitled to their informed opinion. I'm also of the opinion that a "free" opinion is worth what one has paid for it. Evidently, Nate-boy feels that a "free opinion" means having no information whatsoever about the magazine other than the names of columnists. And, of course, the fact that it's not titled "Genii."

A magazine which is aimed at the hobbyist in each of us, compared to a magazine with a tight focus towards the close-up magician - with strong nods to the restaurant magician - such a comparison is, at best, ludicrous.

The quality of the Magic Menu speaks for itself. Did the first issue have problems? What first issue didn't? Will it improve? Undoubtedly. Does Nate have the slightest idea what the strengths, qualities, and problems might have been? Doubtful.

What we are seeing is a troll with a desperate need for attention. He's not even amusing. Mark Lewis serves a purpose and keeps us not only amused, but downright jolly. Nate is a pale imitation, who wants to grow up to be someone whose opinion counts.

*jeep!
--your obedient Grandpa


What an emotive and blunt criticism. You may not grasp the irony, but if you had written a similar critical and excoriating post about The Magic Menu you would be ostracized and receive bullying posts from young magic bucks you've never heard of or read about. How ironic that you feel compelled to post in this manner to defend a magazine simply because I have compared it with others in the market and found it not to be on par with the better ones.

As for Gordon and the other one: you are the product and I am the consumer. I decide whether you meet my expectations. Threats and snide little comments questioning the validity of my opinion are nugatory. Your time would be far better spent working on your writing and reasoning skills, as is evident from your posts.

Now if Richard wants me to bow out of this thread, I am happy to do so, though I don't see that expressing a dissenting opinion should be all that controversial.

Nathan

Top
#207485 - 11/09/09 04:03 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Nathan Muir]
Glenn Bishop Online   content



Registered: 03/14/08
Posts: 417
 Originally Posted By: Nathan Muir

I am sure the magazine is very useful to a complete beginner who wants to do some bar or restaurant magic. Some of the tricks were excellent in that regard.

Having been a magician that used to pitch magic to magicians from a magic shop. When a magician often calls a book or some other publication "good for beginners". Or something to that sort.

I think "good commercial magic for the entertainer that wants to make a living doing magic".

I think that tricks like the vanishing shot glass. The vanishing coin in the shot glass - coin penetration and other bar and close up magic as commercial magic.

Just because a trick is simple in method doesn't make it a beginner trick in my opinion. And just because a trick is hard to do in my opinion it does not make it a trick for the serious advance magician as well.

Magic for an audience can be simple or advanced in method because the audience doesn't care about the method - only the magician does. The audience only wants to be entertained. The method is only needed to get to the entertainment and the effect of magic. And often the simple method is the better method.

I am interested in this publication because I am looking for new commercial ideas - not cards. I know enough card work - more than I need to do my job as a performing commercial magician.

Who "IS" working!

Please PM me more info about Magic Menu.

Thanks in advance.

Just my opinion.
_________________________
Bish The Magish

Top
#207489 - 11/09/09 04:08 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Glenn Bishop]
Nathan Muir Offline



Registered: 06/07/09
Posts: 82
There you go. I got you one new customer.

Funny how this discussion thing works, isn't it? Stimulates the debate. Encourages enquiring minds to check it out for themselves.

Top
#207490 - 11/09/09 04:22 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Nathan Muir]
Glenn Bishop Online   content



Registered: 03/14/08
Posts: 417
Nathan - Just because you are not into good commercial magic that doesn't say that others are not. There are some magicians out there in the world - that do magic for a living.

I have been in magic for 40 years are more. Good commercial magic is very rare in my opinion because it has to grow and evolve over the acid test of doing shows over and over again for real audiences.

I am working and at this time I am looking for new ideas because I get lots of repeat customers.

Having said that - if it is not your cup of tea - I hope you have fun doing what ever it is that you do.

Just my opinion.
_________________________
Bish The Magish

Top
#207492 - 11/09/09 04:29 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Paul Gordon]
Silly Walter Offline



Registered: 03/16/08
Posts: 90
 Originally Posted By: Paul Gordon
Dear Silly Walter,

May I ask why the rudeness? Have you read the 1st issue, or are you prejudiced? If you have read it, what don't you like?

Yours, Paul Gordon


Have I read it? In the past, yes. I have all of the issues from the first 10 years and the second run made around the turn of the 21st century. I was looking forward to another run.

Do I have any interest in reading it now with contributors I laughed at?

No.

Why? For the same reason I won't go see a movie starring Larry the Cable Guy. Because I know it is going to suck.

I do retract my earlier statement about Scott guinn. He is nice.
_________________________
Silly Walter The Polar Bear

Top
#207496 - 11/09/09 04:53 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Silly Walter]
Paul Gordon Online   content



Registered: 05/01/08
Posts: 162
Loc: UK
 Originally Posted By: Silly Walter

Do I have any interest in reading it now with contributors I laughed at?

No.

Why? Because I know it is going to suck.


This comment says far more about you than it does me or my fellow contributors.

Paul Gordon
_________________________
Secure Online Magic Shop: http://www.paulgordon.net/shop.html

Top
#207498 - 11/09/09 05:01 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Paul Gordon]
John LeBlanc Offline



Registered: 01/17/08
Posts: 98
Loc: Houston, TX
On the other hand, Paul, that allows for the possibility that such low expectations can easily be exceeded. Frankly, it occurs to me negative comments are more likely to produce additional subscriptions than glowing ones, and for that very reason.
Top
#207514 - 11/09/09 07:30 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Silly Walter]
Necromancer Offline



Registered: 01/22/08
Posts: 151
Loc: Chicago
 Originally Posted By: Silly Walter
Do I have any interest in reading it now with contributors I laughed at?

No.

Why? For the same reason I won't go see a movie starring Larry the Cable Guy. Because I know it is going to suck.


Point of fact: Pixar's Cars was very enjoyable.

Best,
Neil
_________________________
Neil Tobin, Necromancer
Appearing weekly in
http://SupernaturalChicago.com

Top
#207516 - 11/09/09 09:11 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Necromancer]
Jonathan Townsend Online   content



Registered: 01/17/08
Posts: 3291
Loc: Westchester, NY
What does Necromancer's enjoying Cars have to do with Silly Willy the Polar Bear avoiding movies with Larry the Cable Guy?
Top
#207518 - 11/09/09 09:26 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Jonathan Townsend]
Jim Maloney Administrator Offline



Registered: 07/23/01
Posts: 2107
Loc: Central New Jersey
Larry the Cable Guy provided one of the voices in Cars.

-Jim

Top
#207521 - 11/09/09 09:39 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Jim Maloney]
Jonathan Townsend Online   content



Registered: 01/17/08
Posts: 3291
Loc: Westchester, NY
Jim, since when does one person's taste invalidate another's taste?

It's not like Gertrude really disliked her son even if she might have preferred his father's brother.

Top
#207527 - 11/09/09 11:33 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Jonathan Townsend]
David Acer Online   content



Registered: 02/09/08
Posts: 79
Loc: Montreal, Canada
Hi Folks,

I think it's worth mentioning that, in its first incarnation, the Magic Menu was a grass-roots endeavor by a working pro who was grappling with the same theatrical and practical issues as his fellow columnists and readers. To me, that gave the magazine a real-time, real-world feel that was unique in the trade, and as a restaurant worker (at the time), I got a lot from reading it.

In 2009, the audience for The Magic Menu has likely changed, just as audiences at restaurants have changed, since 20 years ago there was no Criss Angel, no "street magic" and (even more horrifying) only six or seven ways to do Three Fly. If The Magic Menu has been resurrected to address those changes, and the corresponding challenges (opportunities?) they present, then it should have as its readership all the magicians struggling to address them as well. Whether or not that's you is easy enough to determine.

Top
#207539 - 11/10/09 02:22 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: David Acer]
Richard Perrin Online   content



Registered: 01/17/08
Posts: 191
Loc: Grovetown, Georgia
No need to lock this thread. I find this interesting until the solution has been made BUT it's your forum... you have the rights to lock it.
Top
#207540 - 11/10/09 02:54 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Silly Walter]
Scott F. Guinn Offline
Member


Registered: 11/10/09
Posts: 3
 Originally Posted By: Silly Walter

I do retract my earlier statement about Scott guinn. He is nice.


Thank you, Walter. Retraction accepted (FWIW).

Top
#207542 - 11/10/09 03:15 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Scott F. Guinn]
Scott F. Guinn Offline
Member


Registered: 11/10/09
Posts: 3
For some reason, the rest of my post didn't get entered. so i'll try again.

I do not claim to be the greatest restaurant magician who ever lived. I have done restaurant magic for a long time, and I learned a few things as I went. I'll share some of those things as we go along, and I'll try to make my articles as well-written and engaging as possible. But do I think I am the end-all, be-all of restaurant magic? Absolutely not.

I'm still learning from other people, and maybe there are some people out there who can learn something here and there from me. My intent in participating as a columnist for TMM is simply to offer what I can to those who maybe aren't as experienced as I, just as others more experienced than I have helped me. Nothing more, nothing less.

I have no qualms with performers who have more experience than me stating they feel my columns are too basic. I don't begrudge anyone his right to opine that the content of my articles are dead wrong. Whether you decide to even bother to read my column is totally at your own discretion, as it should be.

I do want to say this, however. Say what you will about Christopher Lyle, but there is no denying that he is a skilled magician who has been performing regularly at restaurants for a long time. Maybe you personally don't care for Paul Gordon for some unknown reason, but there is no denying that he is a prolific author with more success and name recognition than all but a very few in the magic community. Paul Green's body of work speaks for itself, as does Jim Sisti's. I, for one, am honored to have been asked to be a part of this publication.

The Magic Menu isn't for everyone, though. And that's OK. Isn't it?

Top
#207544 - 11/10/09 05:04 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Scott F. Guinn]
Nathan Muir Offline



Registered: 06/07/09
Posts: 82
Silly Walter,

I agree, Guinn's good value, as is Paul Green. I also think that Sisti's reviews of products were pretty good value.

Nathan

Top
#207545 - 11/10/09 06:46 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Glenn Bishop]
El Mystico Online   content



Registered: 01/17/08
Posts: 454
Loc: Leamington Spa
 Originally Posted By: Glenn Bishop
Good commercial magic is very rare in my opinion because it has to grow and evolve over the acid test of doing shows over and over again for real audiences.



I'm surprised no one picked up on this comment by Glenn. I thought it was spot on.
I think most magic in all magazines and most books fails this test - there are some glorious exceptions.

But, of course, just because one magician has evolved a routine to suit himself over years doesn't mean that evolution will suit you..in fact, it probably guarantees it won't. But such routines are worth studying for the lessons they provide.

Top
#207546 - 11/10/09 08:13 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: El Mystico]
Jonathan Townsend Online   content



Registered: 01/17/08
Posts: 3291
Loc: Westchester, NY
continuing on from El Mystico's analysis

... and this is why it is critical to present the performer/inventor's intentions and presuppositions when offering a work for publication so the student can understand both the contributors objectives as well as their findings and so build from that knowledge by way of the example offered.

From the above one might start to wonder if works failing to offer more than rote procedure are a suitable subject for literary review by way of deconstruction, a sort of historical record of what folks wanted others in this craft makes some sense in some context.

For just desserts Gertrude had a pumpkin mousse with vanilla Chantilly topped with whipped cream.


Edited by Jonathan Townsend (11/10/09 08:20 AM)
Edit Reason: left out the obvious jape about folks who insist on showing crochetted sweaters for ones balls courtesy of the wife.

Top
#207604 - 11/10/09 08:45 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Jonathan Townsend]
Christopher Lyle Online   content



Registered: 11/07/09
Posts: 26
Loc: Texas
For those of you that have have expressed your positive thoughts regarding The Magic Menu, I wanted to say say THANK YOU for your support...not only of The Menu itself, but of the columnists involved in the project. Thank you for giving us a chance to wow you...

To those who elect to post hateful comments about the project based on nothing more than the fact that we're not Genii and many of the contributors are not well known to the magic community, all while cowardly hiding behind false identities and screen names...well, you have my pity.

I find it very sad and discerning that there can be people out there in the world who are so close minded that they cannot see past their own level stupidity.
_________________________
In Mystery,

Christopher Lyle
http://www.lylemagic.com
Columnist - The Magic Menu

Top
#207605 - 11/10/09 08:54 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Christopher Lyle]
Jonathan Townsend Online   content



Registered: 01/17/08
Posts: 3291
Loc: Westchester, NY
 Originally Posted By: Christopher Lyle
...
I find it very sad and discerning that there can be people out there in the world who are so close minded that they cannot see past their own level stupidity.


Always good to have an editor's help before going to print.


Edited by Jonathan Townsend (11/10/09 08:54 PM)
Edit Reason: grammar was a proof reader.

Top
#207606 - 11/10/09 09:00 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Glenn Bishop]
Nathan Muir Offline



Registered: 06/07/09
Posts: 82
 Originally Posted By: Glenn Bishop
Nathan - Just because you are not into good commercial magic that doesn't say that others are not. There are some magicians out there in the world - that do magic for a living.

I have been in magic for 40 years are more. Good commercial magic is very rare in my opinion because it has to grow and evolve over the acid test of doing shows over and over again for real audiences.

I am working and at this time I am looking for new ideas because I get lots of repeat customers.

Having said that - if it is not your cup of tea - I hope you have fun doing what ever it is that you do.

Just my opinion.


Glenn,

You know nothing about me and are in no position to speculate in an ad hominem fashion. However, I know quite a deal about you.

I therefore think you would benefit from a subscription to The Magic Menu.

Paul Green's column, as I have noted, is excellent. As are some of the interviews with "name" magicians.

Nathan

Top
#207608 - 11/10/09 09:09 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Nathan Muir]
Brad Henderson Online   content



Registered: 01/17/08
Posts: 397
Loc: austin, tx
Nathan's last comment aside, I do think we find an interesting dynamic in the world of magic commentary. It never ceases to amaze me how upset people get when someone puts forth a negative opinion shortly after a release hits the shelves (especially if that release stems from a popular person). Immediately the defense team circles. Invariably we hear comments about how the person may be unqualified to give an opinion or hasn't given the material enough time to judge it. Yet, no one seems to have a problem with positive reviews suffering from the same set of conditions. (Or positive reviews BEFORE an item comes out!)

In my mind, as long as the opinion giver has viewed or obtained the product in question, they should be allowed to comment. It is nice to know about the opinion giver as it allows one to not only put their opinions into context but also give them the weight one feels they might deserve. But to dismiss that opinion outright, or worse, to attack someone for having a differing opinion is - well, it's what we do, apparently. (I remember a Cafe thread where a well known producer and his fans bullied the hell out of one poor guy because he found their DVD on restaurant magic to be a rehash of material previously in print.)

Don't get me wrong, there is nothing improper about a heated debate fueled by clashing opinions, but simply because we know the people involved - or even like them - is no reason they should be above critical commentary.

I appreciate that Nathan offered his opinion.

Top
#207611 - 11/10/09 10:04 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Brad Henderson]
Mark.Lewis Online   content



Registered: 09/12/09
Posts: 439
I understand that the contributors do this work for no money. That is the bit that baffles me most of all. Of course I have always had a mercenary nature.
Top
#207612 - 11/10/09 10:32 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Mark.Lewis]
Silly Walter Offline



Registered: 03/16/08
Posts: 90
Gentlemen,

I have reread this thread and read everyone’s views – even the hostile ones. I went back through my previous issues of the Magic Menu and reevaluated my initial assessment and I started to realize that perhaps this one time I might be mistaken.

I might even go as far to say as that I was dead wrong.

Let’s face it. The restaurant and entertainment business has changed over the last 20 years. Who better to write about working at restaurants than today’s workers?

As a result, I will be posting individual apologies to some of the magicians that may have felt "sleighted" by comments made by yours truly.

My apology will be sincere however I will be offering some friendly advice along the way.

Stay Tooned
_________________________
Silly Walter The Polar Bear

Top
#207614 - 11/10/09 11:04 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Brad Henderson]
Christopher Lyle Online   content



Registered: 11/07/09
Posts: 26
Loc: Texas
 Originally Posted By: Brad Henderson

In my mind, as long as the opinion giver has viewed or obtained the product in question, they should be allowed to comment.


That's my point Brad. Guys like Nathan and Silly Walter (both of whom are obviously hiding behind false names) HAVE NOT read the Menu...yet, their offering up their opinions based soley on the fact that they have never heard of us before. It's insanity!

I know that the Magic Menu isn't for everyone. I get that. I also know that those who subscribe will not agree 100% with the material that's contained between the covers. I get that too.

It would be one thing if these guys had come out and said "we've read it, we think it stinks and we hate the contributors." That would be unfortunate, but oh well...it is what it is.

But that's not what's going on here...

There is no informed decesion being made here. I'm just having a very hard time with someone who has never read the new installment blasting us for absolutly no reason...and then when asked WHY they clam up and refuse to answer the questions.



Edited by Christopher Lyle (11/10/09 11:15 PM)
_________________________
In Mystery,

Christopher Lyle
http://www.lylemagic.com
Columnist - The Magic Menu

Top
#207615 - 11/10/09 11:16 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Christopher Lyle]
Mark.Lewis Online   content



Registered: 09/12/09
Posts: 439
I will be delighted to tell you why but I will only be able to relate why somebody else felt why since I haven't read the new issue myself. A young restaurant magician who happens to be a subscriber told me he didn't like it and wished he hadn't subscribed. I asked him why and he told me that one of the contributers rambled and rambled and took up too much space to make a simple point. He also felt another contributor was reviewing material that was old hat and "out of the seventies" whatever that is supposed to mean.

There. That is why.

Top
#207616 - 11/10/09 11:20 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Mark.Lewis]
Christopher Lyle Online   content



Registered: 11/07/09
Posts: 26
Loc: Texas
Mark,

The difference here is that the person you speak of has in fact READ the Menu.
_________________________
In Mystery,

Christopher Lyle
http://www.lylemagic.com
Columnist - The Magic Menu

Top
#207624 - 11/11/09 02:09 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Christopher Lyle]
Nathan Muir Offline



Registered: 06/07/09
Posts: 82
I have read The Magic Menu. If you go back and read my initial comment I was making an observation on the earlier publication. You appear to have blended my comment with Silly Walter's.

I made no observation or judgments on you or Paul Gordon at all. However, each of your contributions to this thread and your bullying PM to me have allowed me to make a pretty accurate assessment of whether the new Magic menu is likely to meet my expectations as an experienced magician and magic consumer.




Top
#207625 - 11/11/09 02:18 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Christopher Lyle]
Silly Walter Offline



Registered: 03/16/08
Posts: 90
Mr. Lyle,

Please accept my apology. I checked out your website, read your bio and I must admit that you definitely have something to offer to the magic community. Your experience, longevity and dedication to your art will only benefit the readers of the Magic Menu. You are living what many magicians dream of doing so at the very least, I think you will make a fine contributor.

Now, I was asked why I found it comical. Now this is before I checked out your website, but there might be a lesson in here somewhere.

Ladies and Gentlemen of the jury, I recognized Christopher Lyle’s name as the dude on the Café. Normally I am very suspicious of the members whose posts reach the thousands, but I read many of Mr. Lyle's posts whilst lurking on the Café’ (yes, I was one of the few that got kicked off I am afraid. I guess I do have something in common with Chris Kavanagh ) \:\) Mr. Lyle comes across as a bully at times, but deep down he means well and is obviously very passionate about what he does. Actions do speak louder than words (even when they are in all caps, or at least it would be a tie).

Recently there was some discussion about hecklers on another thread and it got me wondering , “How could I apply the techniques Mr. Lyle uses to handle internet hecklers on the occasional spectator who heckles me at the restaurant?”

Check this out.

I was at my lucrative corporate gig (a gig I stole from another magician by the way <wink wink>) and did my standard three tricks. I approached a table occupied by a very nice gentleman and a really foxy woman. As I draped my close up mat on the table, I crouched down and pretended to pick something up. I said “Ma’am. Did you drop this?” and I magically produced some fake dog poop (I had it in Tenkai Palm if you were wondering). This always gets a laugh.

Then I went into what I consider to be the second strongest card trick ever invented – Color Monte. After the performance, that couple asked me if I could do real magic. Not to mention, the guy was a good sport and paid me the $14 he owed me after the trick.

Then I closed with what most card magicians would agree is probably the strongest card trick you could do for people. That’s right – Jay Sankey’s “Paperclipped”. So I have the female hold the paperclip holding the card and I tell them it’s a mystery card so they will think they are getting ready to see something spooky. The man selects the card, signs it and returns it to the deck where it gets secretly replaced to the top by using the bluff pass quickly followed by an Ego change sending it to the bottom face up which I reverse with a gravity half pass which sets me up for a Larry jenning’s one handed bottom palm as I hand the deck back to the spectator to shuffle (the misdirection of him shuffling is irresistible and allows you to fold the card). So I go to show them that the mystery card is really the same card the dude signed and the woman said “Uhhh. You switched the card.” Granted, this is such an incredible trick that I couldn’t believe what she said. Personally I don’t like hecklers. Then I remembered how Mr. Lyle handles the internet hecklers and I immediately went into instant defense mode. I scolded her with “What are you talking about? I didn’t switch the card.” She insisted that I did and I started yelling at her. I demanded that she tell me why she thought that but she started to back peddle so I knew I was winning. Even though I repeatedly asked her for her name, she wouldn’t tell me. I told them both that they were stupid and idiotic because Paperclipped fools everybody. After I put down the hecklers, I decided that they didn’t deserve to see the sponge balls and I walked away. This girl had dropped off her business card to try and win a free lunch but I took it out of the jar, wrote down the email address, set the card on fire and emailed her asking her why she won’t tell me what made her say I switched the cards.

OK, maybe it didn’t go quite like that but the point I am trying to make is you need to relax and not get so worked up over what people on the internets say. You can make your point without being so confrontational. A little bit of diplomacy might establish more credibility with your readers and possibly secure some new adoring fans. You can still be a “controversial” contributor without being a bully with the need to always be right.

Once again, I think you will make a great contributor and I retract my post that got you upset enough to join this forum.
_________________________
Silly Walter The Polar Bear

Top
#207626 - 11/11/09 02:39 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Nathan Muir]
Christopher Lyle Online   content



Registered: 11/07/09
Posts: 26
Loc: Texas
 Originally Posted By: Nathan Muir

However, each of your contributions to this thread and your bullying PM to me have allowed me to make a pretty accurate assessment of whether the new Magic menu is likely to meet my expectations as an experienced magician and magic consumer.


I never sent you a "bullying" PM Nathan. My PM was short and sweet and absent of tone. I was simply trying to put my finger on the "why?"

If you took what I said as "bullying" then please accept my apology as it was not intended as such.

Read or don't read it. It really matters not to me. But if you haven't read the "new" Menu, then to slam the magazine and those who subscribe to it as you have been doing is just out of line.
_________________________
In Mystery,

Christopher Lyle
http://www.lylemagic.com
Columnist - The Magic Menu

Top
#207627 - 11/11/09 02:50 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Christopher Lyle]
Nathan Muir Offline



Registered: 06/07/09
Posts: 82
I didn't slam the new magazine. I commented on the quality of the old magazine.

Pay attention.

Top
#207628 - 11/11/09 03:19 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Silly Walter]
Christopher Lyle Online   content



Registered: 11/07/09
Posts: 26
Loc: Texas
Walter,

I accept your apology...and thank you.

You are correct...I am very passionate when it comes to the world of Magic. I've been called "The Angry Magician" and "The Pitbull of Magic" because of how I present myself in forum chats. I don't consider myself a bully...but I will always speak my mind and if necessary, fight my point down the bone to make sure it's heard.

I don't mind if someone disagrees with me. What a boring place the world would be if we always agreed with one another.

The thing is, I see a lot of bad advice dished out on the internet by people who are not qualified to advise anyone. They lack the knowledge and experience of both our craft and the industry to act as an advisor, yet they begin preaching their garbage to others as if they know what their talking about.

My experience has made me very opinionated about how things should be. I do get worked up when it comes to Magic because I see so many things done so poorly by so many people who think they've got it down that I just want to scream.

It bugs me to no end some of the outlandish nonsense that is dished out in these forums by people who have only been in magic for a year or two. People who have no place to give advice out there providing their insight to people as if they've had years of experience and they don't. They should be the ones asking for advice...not providing it.

So yeah...there's a bit of an edge to my personality. When I post something, I'm not going to sugar coat it with flowers and sunshine. I've always been against all this PC nonsense as I'm am anything but.

Some may think that I bully people. I would consider myself a straight shooter who just says it like it is. If I ruffle feathers to get my point across...then I'm fine with that.

So yes, I'm rough and abrasive at times and there's a definite venom to my style, but I always have our art in the best interest.

Thank you for your apology and for your kind words. It's very much appreciated...
_________________________
In Mystery,

Christopher Lyle
http://www.lylemagic.com
Columnist - The Magic Menu

Top
#207629 - 11/11/09 03:35 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Christopher Lyle]
Nathan Muir Offline



Registered: 06/07/09
Posts: 82
Mr. Lyle, I'm guessing there's not a whole lot of observational comedy in your act.
Top
#207630 - 11/11/09 03:38 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Nathan Muir]
Christopher Lyle Online   content



Registered: 11/07/09
Posts: 26
Loc: Texas
 Originally Posted By: Nathan Muir
I didn't slam the new magazine. I commented on the quality of the old magazine.

Pay attention.


You have said in your previous comments:

 Quote:

It was always a bit of an "amateur hour" effort, The Magic Menu. Like reading your great aunt's seasonal bulk letter. It's where guys from the little leagues get to pretend their A-Grade writers and authorities.


 Quote:

Because I have a low but honestly held opinion of third rate magic magazine


 Quote:

Charming little amateur publications are fun to read at times, too. I just don't think the magazine and many of its commentators are in the league of a product like Genii. I have both of the L&L compilations and they are like the Curate's egg: good in parts. I very much enjoyed the Swiss interview, for example. But many of the advice columns are somewhat sophomoric at times, or simply obvious in their wisdoms and insights.


Whether your speaking of the old or the new, everything that I have quoted you on is slamming the magazine, the columnists, Jim Sisti, and all who subscribe.

If comparing us to a magazine that is intended more for the hobbiest and refering to us a 3rd rate isn't slamming us, then I don't know what is. Calling it "amateur hour" when every single person involved is or has been a full time pro in the restaurant magic industry is insulting.

If you're not slamming the Menu, I'd hate to see it when you start.
_________________________
In Mystery,

Christopher Lyle
http://www.lylemagic.com
Columnist - The Magic Menu

Top
#207631 - 11/11/09 03:53 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Christopher Lyle]
Nathan Muir Offline



Registered: 06/07/09
Posts: 82
You had a hissy fit about me not reading the new magazine. I am correcting your confusion: I was clearly criticizing the old magazine. You can call it slamming, I call it robust criticism. It is entirely valid and no amount of whining and bullying will stop people from expressing their minds.

You claim to be hard headed in your response to Silly Walter, but I think it's clear that you have a glass jaw and certainly no eye for detail.

Top
#207632 - 11/11/09 04:01 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Nathan Muir]
Christopher Lyle Online   content



Registered: 11/07/09
Posts: 26
Loc: Texas
I will agree to disagree with you on this subject as I'm growing tired of this debate. Walter came around as I hoped you would...sadly it's not going to happen. The one thing that we apparently both have in common is our abilty to be a stubborn ass. It is what it is.

Call it what you want...it matters not to me.

Peace!
_________________________
In Mystery,

Christopher Lyle
http://www.lylemagic.com
Columnist - The Magic Menu

Top
#207633 - 11/11/09 04:24 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Christopher Lyle]
Nathan Muir Offline



Registered: 06/07/09
Posts: 82
The fact that you have failed to convince me of your position does not make me a "stubborn ass". It simply means you have failed to convince me of your position.

Now if you've finished giving yourself the coup de grace, others may care to discuss the merits (or otherwise) of the Magic Menu.

Top
#207634 - 11/11/09 05:31 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Nathan Muir]
opie Online   content



Registered: 03/14/08
Posts: 456
Loc: austin tx
I just wanted to toss in a congratulations to Sisti and the guys for the MM revival. My copies of the old Menu volumes are within easy reach and are occasional educational reads.....
Top
#207637 - 11/11/09 07:26 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Mark.Lewis]
Terry Online   content



Registered: 01/18/08
Posts: 256
Loc: Kentucky
I subscribed to the previous version and am a subscriber to the new version.

Like any new publication, the first issue shouldn't be the litmus test for the whole run.

The first issue introduces us to the columnists. Is that worth $10 for the issue? No, it isn't.

The first issue contained a few tricks. Is that worth $10 for the issue? Maybe, for some.

The first issue contained clear photographs to illustrate the tricks. Is that worth $10 for the issue? It adds to the value.

If there is one guarantee in magic - no book, magazine or trick hits it out of the park every time.

Maybe we should give Jim and the columnists the opportunity to get the magazine up and running for a couple of issues?

Top
#207651 - 11/11/09 10:25 AM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Terry]
Richard Kaufman Administrator Online   content
The Chief Genii



Registered: 07/18/01
Posts: 12207
Loc: Washington DC
Mr. Lyle and Mr. Muir: SHUT UP. I don't want to see either one of you posting in this thread again.
Top
#207675 - 11/11/09 01:11 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Richard Kaufman]
CraigOusterling Online   happy
Member


Registered: 11/10/09
Posts: 8
Loc: San Jose, CA
I subscribed to The Magic Menu yesterday before reading this thread. WOW. Glad I did BEFORE reading this thread. I would have second guessed myself a couple of oh nine or ten times.

I'm not sure if I should look forward to seeing it arrive in the post box or go hide in a closet and slit my wrists for spending 10 bucks an issue.

Come to think of it... I've spent more on a burger and beers for lunch than the subscription price of TMM. Reflecting on that I don't feel so bad any more. I Guess I can cancel that therapist appointment.

Congrats to Jim Sisti and company for producing a magic publication. Choices are good. It could turn out to be a great read or to be a total disappointment. I'm willing to take the chance.

[sarcasm](My guess is I'll get some good routines out of TMM then heaven forbid go THANK the author for printing the thing and encourage them to keep doing it.) [/sarcasm]
_________________________
There is no magic, there are only magicians and people's perceptions.

Top
#207695 - 11/11/09 02:11 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: CraigOusterling]
Silly Walter Offline



Registered: 03/16/08
Posts: 90
 Originally Posted By: CraigOusterling
I subscribed to The Magic Menu yesterday before reading this thread. WOW. Glad I did BEFORE reading this thread. I would have second guessed myself a couple of oh nine or ten times.

I'm not sure if I should look forward to seeing it arrive in the post box or go hide in a closet and slit my wrists for spending 10 bucks an issue.

Come to think of it... I've spent more on a burger and beers for lunch than the subscription price of TMM. Reflecting on that I don't feel so bad any more. I Guess I can cancel that therapist appointment.

Congrats to Jim Sisti and company for producing a magic publication. Choices are good. It could turn out to be a great read or to be a total disappointment. I'm willing to take the chance.

[sarcasm](My guess is I'll get some good routines out of TMM then heaven forbid go THANK the author for printing the thing and encourage them to keep doing it.) [/sarcasm]


Craig. Allow me to intervene in your wrist slitting attempt. Getting blood out of a color changing knife is easier said than done. All you will be able to do with it after the wrist cut is “Did you drop a red knife? Look. Now it’s red.”

I am certain that your money was well spent. Even though I always thought the older issues of the Magic Menu were hit or miss, there were enough hits for me to continue to receive it. Even though I haven’t read the first issue, I am now familiar with some of the contributors I initially had mocked.

Christopher Lyle is a seasoned pro and most likely his writings will generate controversy, however he is expressing points of view that he has obtained from his long magic career as a restaurant worker. You may love what he writes or you may dislike it, but at the very least, his style of writing is quite intriguing. I may not like his view point, but I like how he writes. Ultimately your mileage may vary. The good news is, if you disagree with something he wrote, you can send him a note or post the question on line and he will take time out of his busy schedule to address any concerns.

Paul Gordon is pretty well known amongst magicians as an author and lecturer but he also makes a living with cards for the layfolk. He has contributed a couple of effects in the issue you are about to receive and the tricks could be ones that you will love. Paul has contributed tricks to the Magic Menu as an "unpaid contributor", because he wants to benefit restaurant workers by passing on routines that have given him success.

Both Paul and Christopher could also write articles on creating a professional looking website for magicians. I thought Christopher’s website was excellent and then I looked at Paul’s website and was just as amazed. These guys are professionals and as a client, I would be more likely to contact either one of these guys before I contacted someone on some of the sites that look like it was done by some 14 year old.

Speaking of card tricks in Magic Menu, there are some good and some that don’t read so well, but if you can track down the Nov/Dec 1997 issue, you will see a card trick by Paul Green called “The Odds Are With Me”. It is his handling of the Vernon challenge trick. If I am not mistaken, this is the trick that landed Paul Green a number of gigs with Levis, Inc. If I had a routine that guaranteed me shows like that, I probably would have kept it to myself. Paul Green did the opposite and gave it away as a contributor to the Magic Menu to benefit the magic community. I still use this one. Thanks Paul !!

Scott Guinn is another contributor and is one of the nicest people you will ever meet online. He impresses me the most. Many magicians think that working in Las Vegas is the zenith of success, but lets face it. Anyone can get a job doing magic in Vegas (Chris Angel’s “Believe” ). Scott Guinn made his living doing magic in Idaho. As a matter of fact, Scott Guinn was the biggest attraction in Idaho until they relocated the world’s largest ball of string to the state. Seriously, he knows his stuff and is able to get his point across very kindly.

So once again, I think you made a wise decision even though I have not read the first issue and am technically not qualified to make a statement about whether or not it is good. What may appear as senseless drivel to me in some spots may be words of wisdom to your ears. It is a decision you will have to make.

But realistically, for $10 an issue, you are getting enough good advice from todays workers to justify that amount of spending.

Just my opinion.
_________________________
Silly Walter The Polar Bear

Top
#207701 - 11/11/09 02:32 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Silly Walter]
Paul Gordon Online   content



Registered: 05/01/08
Posts: 162
Loc: UK
Thank you, Silly Walter, for the very kind words...and glad you like my website! All the best, Paul Gordon
_________________________
Secure Online Magic Shop: http://www.paulgordon.net/shop.html

Top
#207716 - 11/11/09 03:59 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Paul Gordon]
Silly Walter Offline



Registered: 03/16/08
Posts: 90
 Originally Posted By: Paul Gordon
Thank you, Silly Walter, for the very kind words...and glad you like my website! All the best, Paul Gordon


Mr. Gordon I do apologize for my earlier statement and for comparing you to Larry the Cable Guy. I did some research on Larry the Cable Guy and he is even more talented than I had first imagined. Others have recognized this talent and as a result the phrase "Git-R-done" is the battle cry for many American hillbillies.

I guess technically comparing you to Larry the cable guy is actually a compliment.

Glad to see you were selected to be a contributor. I am sure it is probably flattering when another magician comes to you and shows you their handling of one of YOUR routines you published - whether it is from one of your books or from a future issue. These future magicians will make changes to your routines to suit their handling and inspire future generations of magicians as well. A nice little evolutionary chain inspired by your work.

You may publish the next routine that lands a future restaurant performer his first gig or lands another worker multiple gigs with a Fortune 500 Company. That would certainly be worth the subscription.

Best of luck with the magazine Paul.
_________________________
Silly Walter The Polar Bear

Top
#207748 - 11/11/09 06:40 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Silly Walter]
Jim Sisti Online   content



Registered: 01/17/08
Posts: 38
Loc: New England
For those who asked, we've now put up a short clip on The Magic Menu website showing what Daniel Greenwolf's Ghost Card move is supposed to look like. Daniel was nice enough to stop by this afternoon so we could shoot it. It's performance only but those who have the new issue will be able to see the hand and card positions necessary to get this to work. The clip is located here.

And, to those of you who had the courage of your convictions to post in this thread with your actual names, I will not be commenting any further other than to say that your input has been appreciated and noted.

Top
#207760 - 11/11/09 08:32 PM Re: The Magic Menu [Re: Jim Sisti]
Jager Online   content



Registered: 07/24/09
Posts: 20
Loc: L.A. California
 Originally Posted By: Jim Sisti
The clip is located here.



I can't find the clip on this webpage.

I subscribed yesterday and I can't wait to see whats on the Menu.
_________________________
Kelly Smith
Jager

Top
Page 1 of 2 12>


Moderator:  Dustin Stinett, Jim Maloney 
Hop to:
Advertising










Search
Who's Online
187 registered (magicking, Gerhard Dutschke, Jacky Kahan, Brandon Hall, P.T. Murphy, erlandish, Baph, Dick Koornwinder, Anne Christie, Jason England, John Signa, Magic Mike, Mark.Lewis, bnburns, Tom Frame, mai-ling, Pete Poskiparta, Jonathan Townsend, AnthonyBrahams, Kenardo, Steve Brooks, Steve Bryant, Scotto, El Mystico, MaxM, jim rawlins, Joe Mckay, Bob Farmer, Marco Pusterla, jason156, Joe S., James Alan, Rennie, Tomas Blomberg, Tabman, Phil Schwartz, David Oliver, Josef Held, Barefoot Boy, Benny K, Jeff Pierce Magic, Bob Gerdes, Jeffrey Korst, Magic Newswire, Glenn Bishop, Jager, Bo Jonsson, Andrew Pinard, Huggie, Steve Cobb, 11 invisible) and 970 anonymous users online.

Generated in 0.078 seconds in which 0.01 seconds were spent on a total of 14 queries. Zlib compression enabled.

 
Copyright © 2007 by The Genii Corporation.
All Rights Reserved. No image, artwork, or text from these pages may be reproduced in
any form or by any means without the written permission of The Genii Corporation. Violators will be prosecuted.